Could you create an example on how you would consider the structure and
content as "acceptable" so that we can understand what you want to have?
Thanks
Henning
sebb schrieb:
> On 04/06/07, Thomas Vandahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> sebb wrote:
>> > Sorry for the delay in responding.
>> >
>> > The NOTICE file is much clearer, and the Xerox license is identified,
>> > so I am withdrawing my -1.
>> >
>> > When the rules have been clarified, the next release can implement any
>> > changes if necessary.
>> >
>> > Sebastian
>>
>> Thanks, I will clarify the result now, based on your +1 I suppose?
>
> Sorry, I should have been clearer.
>
> I have withdrawn the -1.
> That does not mean I am now totally in favour.
>
> I'm not convinced that the files are quite right yet, so I am now
> abstaining.
>
>> Bye, Thomas.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
--
Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux
91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person
Open Source Consulting, Development, Design | Velocity - Turbine
"Save the cheerleader. Save the world."
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
