Gentle reminder for the IPMC member: this vote needs a third binding vote.

Can you please review the release and vote ?

Thanks !
Regards
JB

On Wed, Feb 18, 2026 at 7:12 AM Alin Jerpelea <[email protected]> wrote:

> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks for clarifiing the release concerns
>
> Best regards
> Alin
>
>
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2026, 21:27 Bismanpal Singh Anand, <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > Thanks for raising this.
> >
> > The ecosystem folder is not a copy of other projects. It holds Apache
> > ResilientDB’s own ecosystem components: things like our GraphQL service,
> > monitoring dashboards, SDKs, app templates, and smart-contract tooling,
> all
> > developed for or as part of the Apache ResilientDB project. Whatever
> third
> > party tools we incorporate in this are documented in the LICENSE file
> (MIT
> > or CC0 with source URL).
> >
> > The excluded files in ecosystem/ fall into two categories:
> > 1. Format limitations: Some files (.mdx and .json) don't support comment
> > blocks. Adding the standard ASF source header at the top would break
> > parsing/execution or be invalid in those formats. Per the ASF source
> header
> > policy and the FAQ on exceptions (
> > https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#faq-exceptions
> > <
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/e3b33b70f38b93b81cb9c386cec916b3a2d676a4?u=12264691
> > >)
> > , we treat these as cases where the full header isn't feasible.
> > 2. Third-party code: Files excluded under ecosystem/monitoring are
> > third-party components that run directly in that project. These are
> > documented in our LICENSE file under the Creative Commons Zero v1.0
> > Universal (CC0) license section, with source attribution. Per ASF policy
> on
> > third-party works, we do not add the standard Apache License header to
> > third-party source files; instead, we document their licensing in the
> > LICENSE file.
> >
> > Additional third-party components live in a dedicated third_party/
> folder,
> > and their original licenses are documented and referenced in our LICENSE
> > file, in line with ASF policy on third-party works.
> >
> > If this is able to address all the concerns, we can continue with the
> > release vote.
> > -
> > Best,
> > Bismanpal Singh Anand
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2026 at 1:12 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I change my vote to +1 (binding) as the podling clarified.
> > >
> > > I suggest to fix the missing ASF header in ecosystem/monitoring folder
> > for
> > > the next release.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > JB
> > >
> > > Le lun. 16 févr. 2026 à 06:55, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]>
> a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > 0 (binding)
> > > >
> > > > I'm a bit confused about the ecosystem and thirdparty folders and
> > what's
> > > > in there (in the source distribution). It seems to be "code/complete
> > > copy"
> > > > of other projects to be included in ResilientDB, but it's not
> > documented
> > > in
> > > > the LICENSE. Can you please clarify ?
> > > >
> > > > nit: the link to dist.apache.org is splitted in the vote email.
> > > > nit: you can cleanup old releases from dist.apache.org dev
> > > >
> > > > I checked:
> > > > - source distribution
> > > > -- incubating is in the name/version
> > > > -- checksum and signature are good
> > > > -- DISCLAIMER is present
> > > > -- LICENSE/NOTICE looks good. However, I'm a bit confused by
> ecosystem
> > > and
> > > > thirdparty folders. It seems they include modules which are not part
> of
> > > the
> > > > ResilientDB project, but "external" projects. If the code is copied
> > from
> > > > others projects, it should be documented (with license) in the
> LICENSE
> > > file.
> > > > -- ASF header is missing in some files, especially in the
> > > > ecosystem/monitoring folder. See the point above.
> > > > -- No binary/compiled binary found in the source distribution
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > JB
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 14, 2026 at 11:59 PM Bismanpal Singh Anand <
> > > > [email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> Hello Incubator PMC,
> > > >>
> > > >> The Apache ResilientDB community has voted on and approved the
> release
> > > >> candidate Apache ResilientDB (incubating) 1.12.0-incubating-rc2 on
> our
> > > >> [email protected] list.
> > > >>
> > > >> ResilientDB Community Vote Thread:
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/9y7r3y8r5lpr19cgwodbnor38kfpm2v6
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/485733896e7f92d2a7eba3cf7dd7d02f76be9cb2?u=12264691
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Vote result thread:
> > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/3ox4rfc5ct6j8vzmk4lst8tw6dm2c4sj
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/17b7e6ff0921b2167a4f8696deea3ad1bb2b2862?u=12264691
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> The official Apache source release to be deployed to
> dist.apache.org:
> > > >> https://dist.apache
> > > >> .org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/1.12.0-incubating-rc2/
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/f29dabe2c5c88cc6374275b5ffc433d1a4f48e28?u=12264691
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> This source release has been signed with a PGP available here
> (Apache
> > > ID:
> > > >> bisman):
> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/resilientdb/KEYS
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/55a87fa9f362e78aa0f27f192bae67a5d6072dfa?u=12264691
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Git branch for the release:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-resilientdb/tree/v1.12.0-incubating-rc2
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/bfb0b407bc9e9bc1379ca39708f820eb4f1f9f28?u=12264691
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Please download, verify, and test.
> > > >>
> > > >> The *VOTE* will pass after 3 binding approvals.
> > > >>
> > > >> [ ] +1 approve
> > > >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> > > >> [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
> > > >>
> > > >> To learn more about Apache ResilientDB, please see
> > > >> https://resilientdb.incubator.apache.org/
> > > >> <
> > > >>
> > >
> >
> https://l.gotourl.es/l/029fe4b77fd9e6ef18f74209794a794649b77f54?u=12264691
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >> Checklist for reference:
> > > >> [ ] Download links are valid.
> > > >> [ ] Checksums and signatures.
> > > >> [ ] LICENSE/NOTICE files exist
> > > >> [ ] No unexpected binary files
> > > >> [ ] All source files have ASF headers
> > > >> [ ] Can compile from source
> > > >>
> > > >> -
> > > >> Regards,
> > > >> Bismanpal Singh Anand
> > > >>
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bismanpal Singh Anand
> >
>

Reply via email to