+1 (binding) Checked the following: - Download release artifacts - Check the tag and last commit ID - Compare checksums and PGP signatures of source and binary packages - Extract source and binary packages, source package has correct name - LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct
One suggestion for future source packing, those .* files, such as .idea and .github can be excluded from the source package. Bests, Sammi Chen On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 12:47, Jean-Baptiste Onofré <[email protected]> wrote: > My question is not on bundle term, it’s more this sentence sounds that > other code than the ones listed in the license is bundled. If not, it means > that this sentence is just an intro for the list after (which I guess) but > it’s confusing to me. > > As said, the license is correct here, but it’s just to clarify with the > podling. > > Regards > JB > > Le mer. 22 oct. 2025 à 23:52, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> a > écrit : > > > HI, > > > > > -- LICENSE is correct but "This product bundles various third-party > > > components" looks weird to me (as it's source, nothing is bundled) > > > > Bundled is teh correct term; it just means included, and third-party code > > is included in the source release. > > > > Kind Regards, > > Justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
