As far as I'm concerned, I'm not super fond of more acronyms. "Member of PMC" is clear and good enough.
Le mar. 9 juil. 2024 à 12:36, Zhang Yonglun <zhangyong...@apache.org> a écrit : > In the past, this kind of situation occurred more frequently, but most > have been corrected in recent years, precisely because people actively > pointed out the issues and encouraged corrections. I'd suggest we > continue to popularize the notation of PMC Member. > Of course, if the MPMC acronyms is perfect and elegant, it would be > worth the time to implement. But if we create a new acronyms for the > sake of a very few people using it incorrectly, then it might seem a > bit contrived. > The term PMC Member itself is not wrong, it's just that some people > have mistakenly used PMC in its place. Why would we expect that > changing PMC Member to MPMC would prevent these people from using it > incorrectly? > If we introduce MPMC, should we also consider simultaneously add CPMC > (PMC Chair) and MASF (ASF Member) to ensure that all roles have a fair > acronyms? Otherwise, MPMC might seem a bit out of place. > > Best Regards, > Zhang Yonglun > > Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> 于2024年7月3日周三 08:05写道： > > > > Hello all, > > > > I am getting really tired of seeing people refer to *MEMBERS* of a PMC as > > "PMCs". > > > > PMC stands for Project Management Committee. > > > > You have MEMBERS of that PMC. > > > > People are never to be called a PMC, nor a group of them as PMCs. People > > are not committees. The acronym "PMC" is short for a committee, not a > > person. > > > > Please stop the confusion. Teach the community how to use the proper > terms. > > > > Thanks, > > Greg > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
