> Your suggestion is great, thanks again for your help and Xuanwo.

I'm happy to help you. Looking forward to your next VOTE.

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, at 16:35, LinkinStar wrote:
> Hello Sheng Wu,
>
> Your suggestion is great, thanks again for your help and Xuanwo. We're
> already in the process of fixing the release process documentation and I
> will cancel this vote.
>
> Best regards,
> LinkinStar
>
> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 4:26 PM Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Glad to help.
>> Suggest canceling this vote, and enhancing your release process doc,
>> then, start a new one with a correct signature from the release
>> manager.
>> Notice, don't remove anyone's KEY from KEYS, ever, even it is expired.
>> People may need them to verify your legacy releases in the future.
>>
>> Sheng Wu 吴晟
>> Twitter, wusheng1108
>>
>> LinkinStar <linkins...@apache.org> 于2023年12月20日周三 15:53写道:
>> >
>> > Hello Sheng Wu,
>> >
>> > Yes, I misunderstood. I thought KEYS can only contain one public key, no
>> > other public keys are allowed to exist at the same time. That's why I was
>> > forced to do this signature. It helped me solve a real problem. Thanks a
>> > lot.
>> >
>> > Best regards,
>> > LinkinStar
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:45 PM Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > KEYS is a very for all existing public keys. Not for a specific
>> > > individual. Are you misunderstanding this?
>> > >
>> > > Sheng Wu 吴晟
>> > > Twitter, wusheng1108
>> > >
>> > > LinkinStar <linkins...@apache.org> 于2023年12月20日周三 15:31写道:
>> > > >
>> > > > Hi Xuanwo,
>> > > >
>> > > > Thank you very much for your suggestions. I'm very sorry, perhaps my
>> > > > understanding of the release signature is a little misguided. This is
>> > > > because we feel that there can only be one download address for KEYS,
>> > > e.g.
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/answer/KEYS. If
>> > > there
>> > > > can only be one public key, then there can only be one private key.
>> So we
>> > > > previously felt that all published content can always have only one
>> > > private
>> > > > key to sign. That's why we use this mode. Because we would think
>> that if
>> > > a
>> > > > different person were to sign it, then the public key would change
>> and
>> > > the
>> > > > previous release would not be verified. For example, The A RM signed
>> the
>> > > > released version 1.0.0. The B RM signed the released version 1.1.0.
>> If B
>> > > > replaces the public key
>> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/answer/KEYS,
>> then
>> > > > version 1.0.0 will fail to verify it if you use the same public key.
>> > > >
>> > > > Best regards,
>> > > > LinkinStar
>> > > >
>> > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 3:06 PM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > > Regarding the signature issue you mentioned, only release
>> manager and
>> > > > > joyqi
>> > > > > > know the secret GPG keys. This is to ensure that no matter what
>> the
>> > > > > problem
>> > > > > > is, there is someone available to help resolve issues that arise
>> in
>> > > the
>> > > > > > release.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > I feel like it's better to use different gpg keys that owned by RM
>> > > > > themselves.
>> > > > >
>> > > > > As the community expands, we'll welcome new PPMC members and
>> Release
>> > > > > Managers (RMs) from outside your company. Regarding security, it's
>> > > risky
>> > > > > for RMs to share GPG keys. In terms of community independence, the
>> > > release
>> > > > > process should not be overly reliant on joyqi. Should joyqi be
>> > > unavailable
>> > > > > or preoccupied, can the release process continue without
>> interruption?
>> > > > >
>> > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, at 14:57, LinkinStar wrote:
>> > > > > > Hi Xuanwo,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Firstly, these files in the vaunt folder are reward badges for
>> user
>> > > > > > contributions. For now, we are using it.
>> > > > > > Regarding the signature issue you mentioned, only release
>> manager and
>> > > > > joyqi
>> > > > > > know the secret GPG keys. This is to ensure that no matter what
>> the
>> > > > > problem
>> > > > > > is, there is someone available to help resolve issues that arise
>> in
>> > > the
>> > > > > > release.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Best regards,
>> > > > > > LinkinStar
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 2:41 PM Xuanwo <xua...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > >> Hi,
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> I found those images are included in source tarball:
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> - .vaunt/bug.png
>> > > > > >> - .vaunt/enhancement.png
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Are they needed by users? Is it possible to remove them from
>> the src
>> > > > > >> release?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Regarding PGP signatures, I'm confident that all are valid. But
>> I
>> > > found
>> > > > > >> that those tarball
>> > > > > >> are signed by jo...@apache.org which is not the release
>> manager.
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> Are you internally sharing jo...@apache.org's secret GPG keys?
>> Or
>> > > have
>> > > > > >> you signed those
>> > > > > >> tarballs through CI with the key stored as GitHub secrets?
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> On Wed, Dec 20, 2023, at 14:25, LinkinStar wrote:
>> > > > > >> > Hello,
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     This is a call for vote to release Apache
>> Answer(Incubating)
>> > > > > version
>> > > > > >> > v1.2.1-RC1.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     The vote thread:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/w9ybd1rygd4x9o9ryx3k2ho3n49664p6
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Vote Result:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/7h9rmwn7fbrn7dhk1620lzj43063r7vj
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     The release candidates:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/answer/1.2.1-incubating-RC1/
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Release notes:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-answer/releases/tag/v1.2.1-RC1
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Git tag for the release:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-answer/releases/tag/v1.2.1-RC1
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Git commit id for the release:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-answer/commit/82fdfc77636d8d1ce28710d929a8c22bb52834ef
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Keys to verify the Release Candidate:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/answer/KEYS
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     The vote will be open for at least 72 hours or until the
>> > > necessary
>> > > > > >> > number of votes are reached.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Please vote accordingly:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] +1 approve
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] +0 no opinion
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] -1 disapprove with the reason
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     Checklist for reference:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] Download links are valid.
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] Source code distributions have correct names matching
>> the
>> > > > > current
>> > > > > >> > release.
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each Answer
>> repo.
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] All files have license headers if necessary.
>> > > > > >> >     [ ] No unlicensed compiled archives bundled in source
>> archive.
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >     To compile from the source, please refer to:
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-answer#building-from-source
>> > > > > >> >
>> > > > > >> > Thanks,
>> > > > > >> > LinkinStar
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >> --
>> > > > > >> Xuanwo
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > > >>
>> > > > >
>> > > > > --
>> > > > > Xuanwo
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > >
>> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>> > >
>> > >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>

-- 
Xuanwo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to