HI,
> project still wants to use the CeresDB name in some form. Is this correct
> or not?
> NO.
Then why does the code in the code still refer to CeresDB in 100+ places?
for instance, the source path is:
/horaedb/src/ceresdb
looking at horaedbsrc/ceresdb/bin/ceresdb-server.rs it contains things like:
const NODE_ADDR: &str = "CERESDB_SERVER_ADDR”;
use ceresdb:
println!("CeresDB server tries starting with config:{config:?}”);
in src/ceresdb/Cargo.toml
[package]
name = "ceresdb"
Dockerfile
COPY . /ceresdb
WORKDIR /ceresdb## CeresDBCOPY --from=build
/ceresdb/target/release/ceresdb-server /usr/bin/ceresdb-server
RUN chmod +x /usr/bin/ceresdb-serverCOPY ./docs/minimal.toml
/etc/ceresdb/ceresdb.toml
And as mentioned, 100+ other instances.
You also have things like this, which was published in the last day. If the
name has changed, why is this still being published under the old name?
https://github.com/CeresDB/horaedb/pkgs/container/ceresdb-server
The proposal doesn't address these naming issues; please update it to include
how these will be handled. All of the changes don't need to happen before
donation, just meantion how they will be handled, but you do need to respect
3rd party trademarks.
My previous question regards whether the project has been given permission to
use the CeresDB trademark has still not been answered.
Kind Regards,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
