Hi, > We have tons of examples here in the ASF of project Foo being used to > power commercial product Bar (Geode/Gemfire, Ignite/GridGain, > Kafka/Confluent, and many, many more). So this kind of dual branding > is nothing new -- there's no community fork involved per se.
"Daul branding" is nothing new, but recently, some entities have taken unfair advantage of this (including one you mentioned), and I feel the Incubator should take care that others do not also do this. > It would be nice if the original name of the open source project (as > it existed on Github) was donated to ASF and the new name for a > commercially developed product was picked. But even if it is the other > way around -- I actually don't see any risks for the foundation in > this approach (as long as it is clearly understood that the branding > guidelines on both sides need to be honored). After reading the proposal, I’m not 100% sure the branding guidelines are understood. “HoraeDB” is used, whereas “CeresDB” should be used in several cases. It looks like the rename was only done a couple of weeks ago. Kind Regards, Justin 1. https://github.com/CeresDB/horaedb/commit/7de05192d7fa6d96cdd49ffab4a4fd4754d64b68 --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
