In Groovy's case was the trademark handed over? For Pekkos case I suspect it may be different because Akka trademark is currently owned by another company which is directly "competing" (Pekko is a fork).
On Tue, 11 Oct 2022, 10:51 Matt Sicker, <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > Based on how Groovy joined Apache, it seems as though you can keep the > same package name and work on renaming it in a major version if > there's already binary compatibility concerns. > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 7:14 AM PJ Fanning <fannin...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I'm creating a new thread to avoid filling the Pekko thread with emails > that are only partially related to the proposal. > > > > The current Akka code uses packages that start with 'akka.' and a lot of > the people involved with Pekko seem to prefer to keep the use 'pekko.' > instead of 'org.apache.pekko.' when we rename the Akka packages. > > > > Kafka and Netbeans are examples of Apache projects that don't use > 'org.apache' prefix in their package names. > > > > Is 'pekko.' a viable option or is there a strong preference within the > ASF and the Incubator PMC for 'org.apache.pekko.'? > > > > Regards, > > PJ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
