Hi,

> 1.  [1][2] [3] code under /be/src/gutil/ is come from Apache Kudu

But that not the original source is it, as it is not ASF licensed. If you did 
take ASF code from Kudu then that shovel bee listed in your NOTICE file.

> 2.  [6] [7] means that our previous version had dependencies under a GPL
> license, but it has been removed in the new version. if user want to use
> it, need to solve it by themselves

Thanks for clearing that up.

> 3. [4] [5] The license of this file is indeed unknown. 

Because of this I’m still -1 on the release. However my -1 is not a veto, you 
need a minimum of 3 +1 and more +1s than -1s. The release manager could of 
course decide not to release it even if the vote passes. IMO releasing 
something containing code with an unknown license is probably doing your users 
a disservice.

Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to