What are the similarities and differences from Camel? (I'm not making an argument in any way..just trying to understand it)
On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 11:51 AM Clebert Suconic <clebert.suco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > If you make it generic enough that runs on other messaging solutions > (Kafka, Artemis, ActiveMQ, RocketMQ), you have less risk of being > orphaned. > > however if it's tight coupled with RocketMQ mentioned.. it becomes > more like a sub project of your broker than a separate project. > > What are the plans? > > On Thu, Aug 6, 2020 at 8:58 AM Sheng Wu <wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Eason Chen <daerduoc...@qq.com> 于2020年8月6日周四 下午6:17写道： > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > We do not deny that the community is not really big and active, we share > > > our best practices and look forward to getting more people's attention and > > > help, at the same time can help our colleagues .we believe that as > > > long as we find the right method and organization such as the apache way, > > > the community will become stronger and stronger. > > > > > > > Hi > > > > Thanks for the honesty, I prefer you should adjust the proposal to match > > the reality. Such as > > 1. Just open-sourced > > 2. Have a risk of being an orphaned project > > 3. Community development would be a challenge > > > > I hope you could understand, a project open-sourced from the company, and > > not widely adopted, these are just the fact, don't need to hide them. > > The incubator is welcome this kind of project, once you have enough active > > mentors and initial committers. > > > > --------- > > Personally only, not from an IPMC member perspective > > --------- > > The concerns I raised, are from the perspective of protecting the project, > > a very young community will face heavy loads of joining the ASF incubator > > directly. > > And from my personal experiences, people(especially in China) will > > challenge the qualification of the project. I have seen this happened > > before. > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > > > > > In addition, I want to clarify that these codes are submitted by the > > > entire team within our company, but I open sourced them, as you see some > > > components are not yet open source, we are reviewing and reforming > > > internally, and will open source soon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------------------ 原始邮件 ------------------ > > > 发件人: > > > "general" > > > < > > > wu.sheng.841...@gmail.com>; > > > 发送时间: 2020年8月6日(星期四) 下午5:42 > > > 收件人: "Incubator"<general@incubator.apache.org>; > > > > > > 主题: Re: [DISCUSS] EventMesh Proposal > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi > > > > > > Noticed this a little late. > > > > > > I have some questions about the status of the project, especially about > > > the > > > `Orphaned Products` and the activity of the community. > > > > > > With a project open-sourced since September 2019, this doesn't seem like > > > the status you said in the proposal. > > > 1. If the EventMesh repo is the only code repo, AFAIK, there is only one > > > contributor who has submitted the codes over 110 lines, most are just < 50 > > > lines. https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/graphs/contributors > > > 2. Only have 35 issues opened on the GitHub. > > > https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/issues > > > 3. The issues(since issue #21) since 21 days ago have no comment any all. > > > > > > From my understanding, this project is only limited maintained by one and > > > only one for now. > > > > > > To the project community, could you respond what is the real status now? > > > And why there is a gap between your proposal and GitHub open statistics? > > > > > > Personally, I have concerns about the activity and support of the > > > community, or a little more, whether the basic community has been > > > established. > > > I think the incubator should notice the status, in case, it will be hard > > > to > > > make consensus and release soon in the incubating stage. > > > > > > Sheng Wu 吴晟 > > > Twitter, wusheng1108 > > > > > > > > > Ming Wen <wenm...@apache.org> 于2020年8月6日周四 下午5:24写道： > > > > > > > Hi, Eason, > > > > It's an interesting project. And I have a few questions and > > > > it would be great if you could help: > > > > 1. According to github's statistics[1], most of the code was > > > contributed by > > > > yourself. > > > > So if you're on vacation, this project will not easy to move forward. > > > > 2. An external dependency `logback` is LGPL license, which is > > > Category X. > > > > Can this dependency be removed? > > > > > > > > [1] https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/graphs/contributors > > > > <https://github.com/WeBankFinTech/EventMesh/graphs/contributors>>; > > > > Thanks, > > > > Ming Wen, Apache APISIX & Apache SkyWalking > > > > Twitter: _WenMing > > > > > > > > > > > > Eason Chen <daerduoc...@qq.com> 于2020年8月4日周二 下午6:04写道： > > > > > > > > > Good time of the time to all! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'd like to bring this new interesting project for the > > > discussion, > > > > > comments and feedback with the aim of starting a formal [VOTE] > > > of its > > > > > acceptance into Incubator. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > People behind this project aren't new to Apache: some of them > > > were behind > > > > > the Apache RocketMQ, which I consider a huge success(especially > > > in > > > > China)as > > > > > the community is literally thriving almost 3 years after the > > > graduation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been involved a little bit with this project when it just > > > started > > > > > in WeBank a few years ago. And I'd like to emphasize that the > > > community > > > > > however small it might look so far, has been aligned with Apache > > > ways of > > > > > doing things. Heng Du (from RocketMQ PMC) is very instrumental > > > in > > > > > tirelessly helping this group to learn what it means to be a > > > truly open > > > > > source project. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The code is already under ALv2 and is publicly available. As you > > > will see > > > > > it has a lot of dependency connections with the rest of Apache > > > ecosystem > > > > > and IMO will fit very well here and continue to grow the > > > community. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The project's proposal is available at [1]. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thank you very much for the feedback you're willing to provide! > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > &nbsp;With best regards, > > > > > > > > > > &nbsp;Eason Chen > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [1] > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/EventMeshProposal > > > > > > > <https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/INCUBATOR/EventMeshProposal>> > > > ; > > > > -- > Clebert Suconic -- Clebert Suconic --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
