On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 8:58 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Why having inactive PMC members is not a big deal now? What's the point > of > > keeping them if they r inactive and do nothing or have no interest in the > > project? > > At some point in the future that may become active again or they may plan > to be more active in the near future. Having a few extra people on the PMC > doesn’t hurt a project if they are inactive. > > > There is an inactive IPMC member on the proposed PMC - who didn't > > have time, or bandwidth to help in any way on the project but yet chose > to > > be part of and expressed his intent to be on the proposed PMC. > > I would suggest the project discusses it with them. > > BTW I also agree Mentors shouldn't automatically become part of the new > PMC if they did not help. > That question was actually asked and there are only mentors on the proposed PMC that explicitly expressed they are interested to stay on. The case Suneel raises is one where no merit was earned, which may be worth discussing on private@ indeed. Thanks, Thomas
