On Sat, 2 Mar 2019 at 03:45, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > I agree that it's not ideal but it is not a symptom of a big problem > > either. We have inactive IPMC members who might become active again later > > if a community wants to join the incubator but it's a hassle to leave and > > then join again. > > Some context, over 300 projects have gone through the incubator, 50 are there > currently, each requires a champion and 3 mentors at the start (all IPMC > members), even with some mentors working on multiple podling it's not > surprising the IPMC is 300 people or so. Nor should it be that a large number > of them are inactive as most of the projects they were involved in have > graduated (or retired).
+1 > But despite this some still think it is an issue so we IMO we should address > it, unless they change their minds, and say so here. Personally, I don't think that is a reason to reduce the IPMC count. I think it needs to be established WHY it is thought to be an issue first. > Thanks, > Justin --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
