I've been going back and forth on the topic of TLP vs. Incubator podling. I don't really have a strong opinion but I'm leaning slightly in favor of "straight to TLP" and the past discussion (linked in previous mail) did also have more voices in favor of TLP. But of course there are arguments to be made for both sides.
I've been wondering if anyone here has opinions on this part of the proposal? In a related thread I asked about how to proceed in terms of choosing members for a PMC and one suggestion was to make it depend on the route: * Incubator: On graduation ask and assess current PMC members and see if everyone has proven their merit and is willing to continue * TLP: Start with a PMC consisting of only ASF members (plus additional committers) and then accept additional members for the PMC on a "normal" basis Cheers, Lars On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 1:49 PM Lars Francke <lars.fran...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello everyone, > > this is the result of the discussion I started in December 2018[1]. > > I would like to start this thread to get feedback on a proposal we've been > working on for a project focused on developing training material for Apache > & 3rd party projects. > > The full proposal can be found here < > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/TrainingProposal> > > Disclaimer: It is a bit different than most other proposals as it > basically starts at zero. > > Our main goals for this discussion are: > * Finding mentors and interested contributors > * Discuss whether this should be a Incubator project, straight to TLP or a > Central Service > * Sharpen the scope of the project > > While I personally have a relatively long history as a contributor, > committer etc. at Apache I've never been a mentor before so we would love > for some experienced people to help us out. > > We're looking forward to all kinds of feedback. > > Cheers, > Lars > > [1] < > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/9cb4d7eef73e0d526e0124944c3d37325aa892675351a1eed0a25de3@%3Cgeneral.incubator.apache.org%3E > > >
