Transferring my +1 from the dev vote.

On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 11:45 PM Ohad Shacham <oh...@oath.com.invalid>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> The Apache Omid community has voted on and approved a proposal
> to release Apache Omid 1.0.0-incubating.
>
> PPMC Vote Call:
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201811.mbox/%3ccahuxfymp-_qvcn2qde3bqcqdta3hwbwfa52ygtuqr64qkjk...@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
>
> PPMC Vote Result:
>
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/omid-dev/201811.mbox/%3cCAAF1JdinF60+hsxHbvxcx3oDruGqoE7BJ=gh_EbadFbDRHm8=w...@mail.gmail.com%3e
>
>
> PPMC Vote Summary:
> 4 binding (IPMC member) +1 votes
> 0 non-binding PPMC member +1 votes
> No -1 votes
>
> Release notes for the 1.0.0 release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.0-rc0/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>
>
> Git tag for the release:
>
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-omid.git/?p=incubator-omid.git;a=tag;h=14d5cb2d899ef381be40edc6d95aede50bb396ea
>
>
> Sources for the release:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.0-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.0-src.tar.gz
>
>
>
> Source release verification:
>
>
> PGP Signature:
>
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.0-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.asc
>
> SHA512 Hash:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.0-rc0/apache-omid-incubating-1.0.0-src.tar.gz.sha512
>
> Keys to verify the signature of the release artifact are available
> at:https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/omid/1.0.0-rc0/KEYS
>
>
> We request the permission of IPMC to publish the above release candidate as
> Apache Omid 1.0.0-incubating. Please try out the package and vote. The vote
> is open for a minimum of 72 hours or until the necessary number of votes (3
> binding +1s) is reached. [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Omid
> 1.0.0-incubating [ ] 0 I don't feel strongly about it, but I'm okay with
> the release [ ] -1 Do not release this package because... Please add
> (binding) if your vote is binding.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Ohad and Yoni
>

Reply via email to