>From what I remember reading, the only votes that really seem to require consensus are kicking people out.
On 22 June 2018 at 04:03, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 2:20 AM Hen <bay...@apache.org> wrote: > > ...My assumption is that the rules for voting for an Apache member are > the > > same as for voting for a PMC member or a committer. Ideally there are no > > -1s, but at the end of the day it’s a majority vote.... > > That's my understanding: there are no vetoes except for code changes > as per https://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html > > However, a -1 when electing someone needs to be taken seriously, most > projects that I know do consider it a soft veto...best IMO is to ask > the voter if they agree to change to a -0, indicating that they are > not enthusiastic but not opposed either. > > And if that doesn't work, find out if it's just a minority position > (that we must accept does happen sometimes) or if there's really a > serious problem to address. > > Hope this helps... > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
