Looks great! On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 5:06 AM Li,De(BDG) <l...@baidu.com> wrote:
> We have a general Plan or Roadmap: > > 1. Find out the code, modules, components which duplicates of Impala; > 2. Determine the features which could be merged to Impala under Impala > community support. > 3, Define clearly the interface between the query engine and other > components, such as the storage engine, metadata management, mysql server, > load and export modules, web server and so on. > 4. Separate the Impala query engine from Palo. > > > Best Regards, > Reed > > On 2018/6/19 下午9:48, "Jim Apple" <jbap...@cloudera.com.INVALID> wrote: > > >> > >> I'm not sure if Palo is just a storage system but definitely we will > >> separate query engine from Palo. > >> > > > >That's great news, and I think it will benefit users of Impala and Palo. > > > > > >> Of cource, as you mentioned, "this could be a lot of work", so it will > >> take a long time and we also hope that Impala community could support > >>us. > >> > > > >Yes, I expect so. > >