The vote for releasing Apache Pulsar 1.22.1-incubating is now closed. With a total of +3 binding votes and no -1 votes, the vote passes.
+1s (binding): Dave Justin Jim This is the link to the dev@ vote thread for the same, will update the release process to add this link in the initial mail next release onwards - Thanks Dave for pointing this out. https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/27dbe3f467d2df18bf2799b480d66194bf8943f7fd764ecb9d15773c@%3Cdev.pulsar.apache.org%3E Thanks, Yang, Justin and Craig for your inputs on the ASF and BSD header - we will correct these files by removing ASF header, leaving only BSD header. On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 9:30 AM, Matteo Merli <mme...@apache.org> wrote: > Thanks Yang, Justin and Craig for the discussion. > > We will correct these files by removing ASF header, leaving only BSD header > + comment. > > Matteo > > On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:59 AM Craig Russell <apache....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > I'll add my own chimes to this discussion. > > > > > On Jun 10, 2018, at 2:57 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > ... > > > I think I agree with Matteo that those protobuf files should not have > an > > ASF header. Generally changes to a file are under the original license, > see > > [1], but it not a big issue as BSD is an Category A license and you are > > including the full license text. It’s also seems odd because the license > > calls them out as BSD licensed. > > > > Yes, these files are not being relicensed. Files that are covered by an > > ICLA by the original author, or covered by a software grant can be > > relicensed. In that case, removing the BSD license header and replacing > it > > by the Apache license header is appropriate. > > > > In this case of a BSD-licensed file that has minor changes, the Apache > > license header is inappropriate. The only part of the file that is > > Apache-licensed is the changes made here. So the Apache license header > that > > states that this file is "Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation ... > > under one or more contributor license agreements" is not correct. > > > > The comment line "This file is derived from Google ProcolBuffer > > CodedInputStream class" is sufficient documentation, without the Apache > > license header. > > > > Regards, > > > > Craig > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Justin > > > > > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > Craig L Russell > > Secretary, Apache Software Foundation > > c...@apache.org http://db.apache.org/jdo > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > -- > Matteo Merli > <mme...@apache.org> >
