On 5 June 2018 at 10:51, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> That doesn't do any good to the community if this is recorded privately. > > Unlike ICLA/CCLA documents which are quasi-private (the existence > of a committer account is sufficient to document that the appropriate > forms are on file), other projects that might lean on another project's > imported component, or want to re-integrate previously cleared external > IP need to be able to see that the initial IP clearance occurred. That's > how the notices of IP clearance to general@i.a.o have been useful. > Very true. This is why I've been confused by the idea of just putting this on the secretary since our records are private. -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
