It may have been discussed elsewhere, but I thought it was considered public when the candidate receives the invite.
John On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:31 PM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > Sorry I did not reply sooner. > > IMHO the phrase “are actually elected” should be “have accepted an actual > election” in case the individual does not want the honor. > > Regards, > Dave > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Apr 24, 2018, at 6:08 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > > I've gone ahead and implemented the below, the reminders I'm about to > send > > right now should have it. > > > > John > > > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:05 AM Bertrand Delacretaz < > > bdelacre...@codeconsult.ch> wrote: > > > >>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 10:38 AM, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> ... > >>> "Candidate names should not be made public before people are actually > >>> elected, so please do not include the names of potential committers or > >>> PMC members in your report." > >> > >> +1, just replace PMC with (P)PMC as it's for podlings. > >> > >> -Bertrand > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >> > >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >