Thanks Justin for clarifying. On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > > Thanks for pointing out the json license issue. I searched the code and > > found only a small piece of code that uses it so it shouldn't be hard to > > replace with an alternative. For my understanding, when [1] states "CAN > > APACHE PRODUCTS INCLUDE WORKS LICENSED UNDER THE JSON LICENSE?", does > > either having the source code in the source release or having a build or > > runtime dependency count as "including" the licensed work? In our case > we > > have a build+runtime dependency but do not include the source code. > > Sorry to say but you can’t have a build or runtime dependancy and you > can’t distribute it [1] unless it’s optional [2]. > > Thanks, > Justin > > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#prohibited > 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
