Roman and John, I have created the following JIRA to track this issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HAWQ-1496 ("Deliver LICENSE, NOTICE and DISCLAIMER in main PXF RPM")
Regarding the comment "its a little odd that you only provide RPMs", this is the project's first attempt at delivering convenience binaries. We are learning a lot through this process and didn't want to chew off too much. I believe the community will review delivering additional artifacts in subsequent releases as demand hopefully increases. Regards, -=e On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 2:27 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:05 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 6:37 PM, Ruilong Huo <h...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi IPMC member, > > > > > > > > > The PPMC vote for the Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release has > passed. > > We kindly request that the IPMC now vote on the release. > > > > > > > > > The PPMC vote thread is located here: > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/ee0b81127e75eb2562e91b0a44d56b > 24165c6284a7a46dc03eeb7d6d@%3Cdev.hawq.apache.org%3E > > > > > > > > > The artifacts can be downloaded here: > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/hawq/2.2.0. > 0-incubating.RC3/ > > > > > > > > > The artifacts have been signed with Key : 1B8B6872 > > > > > > > > > All JIRAs completed for this release are tagged with 'FixVersion = > > 2.2.0.0-incubating'. You can view them here: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa? > projectId=12318826&version=12339641 > > > > > > > > > Please vote accordingly: > > > [ ] +1, accept as the official Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating release > > > [ ] -1, do not accept as the official Apache HAWQ 2.2.0.0-incubating > > release because... > > > > I'm +1 on the release with one caveat: it seems that pxf RPMs don't > > deliver LICENSE/NOTICE/DISCLAIMER. > > inside of the RPMs. Normally that would be enough for me to cast a -1, > > but it seems that the JARs inside > > of the RPMs (and these RPMs deliver JARs only) actually bundle the > > required files. > > > > > > > My take it is that we shouldn't hold a release for that -- but I'll > > let the rest of IPMC chime in. > > > > I agree with what you said, assuming there's a JIRA tracking fixing it. I > think the LICENSE/NOTICE should be in the RPMs and should be valid, instead > of just in the JARs. > > BTW its a little odd that you only provide RPMs. Do you also plan to > support DEBs? What about install on macOS/Windows? > > > > > > The rest looks really good: > > * checked sigs and hashes > > * compared source tarball to the git tag > > * checked for license headers in the source > > * installed the RPMs > > > > Thanks, > > Roman. > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > -- *Ed Espino*
