Hi Matteo,
Glad to see you and Pulsar are here.
John's idea is interesting and need to pay attention on it. There are so
many messaging systems in ASF or other organizations, share client
libraries between these products really make sense and will bring great
benefit for our user.
But as Matteo said, this task is very complicated, due to different models
and semantics. So we initiate a brand-new OpenMessaging specification, hope
this spec can establish a interconnected bridge between diverse messaging
solutions.
Regards, yukon Apache RocketMQ Committer
On Thu, Apr 27, 2017 at 4:41 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org>
wrote:
On 26.04.2017 23:19, Joe Francis wrote:
>
> Dear Apache Incubator Community,
>
>
> We would like to submit the Pulsar proposal to the incubator. Our draft
is
> available at:
> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/PulsarProposal
>
> A quick overview of Pulsar:
>
> Pulsar is a highly scalable, low latency messaging platform running on
> commodity hardware. It provides simple pub-sub semantics over topics,
> guaranteed at-least-once delivery of messages, automatic cursor
management for
> subscribers, and cross-datacenter replication.
Without really knowing the details of a messaging platform and even with
the danger of comparing apples and oranges... how would you compare for
example hazelcast based messaging to pulsar?
bye Jochen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
