On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:56 AM Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
> > > On Mar 20, 2017, at 6:45 PM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > > > > +1 for a podlings@ alias. > > > > But what could you possibly want with a podlings-private@ ? We are > > expected to keep private to a minimum, typically involving individuals or > > security issues, and I fail to see how that can apply to 50 or so very > > disperse projects, that changes over time. So I am -1 on that, until I > hear > > some reasonable justification. > > I agree. Private matters will tend to be on a case by case basis. In the > rare case where an all private email to all podlings must go out then each > podling can be addressed one at a time via cut and paste. > > Agreed. Maybe to put it another way, I'm not against the idea of creating a podlings-private style alias, but don't see a strong use case for it. > > > > The pmcs@ alias is IMHO a bad alias and should be changed to go to dev@. > > Way back in time, we had p...@foo.apache.org and the pmcs@ came out of > that > > naming. BUT, we later recognized that pmc@ was being overused. The name > > invited that overuse and we changed it to private@ to signal its intent, > > but pmcs@ was left behind… > > This is not an Incubator mailing list and therefore this is Off Topic. > > Regards, > Dave > > > > > > > Cheers > > Niclas > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 4:17 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:55 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 12:00 PM John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> All, > >>>> > >>>> Before I go ahead with it, wanted to see if others had any opinions. > >> I'm > >>>> planning to ask infra to create a podlings@i.a.o mailing list, which > >>> would > >>>> go to all podlings dev@ list. There may be some scenarios where we > >> need > >>>> to > >>>> communicate out to all podlings. For instance, the logo change and > how > >>> it > >>>> impacts the podlings. > >>>> > >>>> John > >>>> > >>> > >>> This would be more like an alias, similar to @PMCs right ? Also, in the > >>> past, some of these communications would go to podling private (e.g. > Gsoc > >>> info) where there was a request for the podling pmc to discuss this > >>> appropriately in their dev lists? That might still be a viable > approach. > >>> > >>> > >> Yes, I believe that's how infra would implement it. It isn't meant to > >> replace general@ but instead allow us a convenient way to email blast > all > >> podlings. > >> > >> As I was typing the email, I thought about private lists. I wouldn't > mind > >> a podlings-private@i.a.o as well. > >> > >> > >>> BTW, podlings, particular podling mentors should (MUST) be following > all > >>> pertinent general@ discussions. > >>> -- > >>> Sent from my Mobile device > >>> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > > http://polygene.apache.org <http://zest.apache.org> - New Energy for > Java > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
