I think the wording needs tuning, and my own interpretation of the intent has been,
Project claims itself to comply, and list any exceptions and why that is the case. I think that can deal with the invariance that exists. Cheers Niclas On Mar 7, 2017 14:48, "Jim Apple" <jbap...@cloudera.com> wrote: > > Actually, the Maturity Model can be a very nice framework to organize > > incubation around. > > If you're talking about a platonic MM, then I agree. If you are > talking about the MM at > https://community.apache.org/apache-way/apache-project-maturity-model.html > , > I think it needs to be much more carefully written and much more > accurate to be a "nice framework". In particular, "aims to capture the > invariants of Apache projects ... A mature Apache project complies > with all the elements of this model" is wishful thinking or outdated > or both. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
