> On Oct 29, 2016, at 1:54 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:51 PM Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >>> -1 due to the kinesis library issue. >> >> Can you provide a bit more detail on what the objection is with the >> kinesis library? Given it's optional and not being distributed I thought >> this would cover it? [1] >> > > I obviously have a different take than you. I'm more worried about the > derived works aspect of the license as it stands.
What part of the release is a “derived work”? Craig > > >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> 1. http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#optional >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >> >> Craig L Russell c...@apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
