I would have assumed that if Netbeans stakeholders had any issues or question, or requests for clarification, they would have pinged either their champion or one of their proposed mentors.
As it is, it is only on this thread, and not on any Incubator/vote thread that I can see that this even came up, and even then it could easily have been overlooked. To be clear: "Netbeans stakeholders" had serious and misleading information about what Apache provided and it was only brought out via some backchannel discussion with someone not involved in the Netbeans proposal (from the Apache side) at all... AND that this information was ONLY brought out during a thread on board@ about TAC. Hopefully this clarifies my comments. > On Sep 27, 2016, at 4:57 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 1:34 PM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: >> >>> On Sep 27, 2016, at 12:40 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Bingo! This is word-for-word what I was explaining at f2f with NetBeans >>> stakeholders yesterday. There assumption was that ASF is a free version >>> of what Sun and Oracle were providing in terms of infrastructure to their >>> project. All the bells-n-whistles. Everything. >> >> This is the first I heard of this... Anyone from the podling mentor >> list there? >> >> Seems a weird out-of-band conversation to have with "stakeholders" > > Huh? I really don't get either of your comments. > > Thanks, > Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
