On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 8:41 AM Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 8:01 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > Marvin had sent out an audit of podlings out of alignment, we should > double > > check that as going through quarterly reports. > > This vote makes me cranky. Everyone is focused on making it easier for > podlings. Is the goal of incubation to pass a graduation vote or to learn? > Its to learn, but... > > The presence of the word "incubator" in the URL is deliberate: it alerts > users > that a podling is incubating. I'd feel better about this proposal if > podlings > weren't so successful about concealing their incubation status[1][2]. > I would argue that the inclusion of "incubator" is the easier solution, and that forcing them to comply with branding rules (logo, disclaimer, naming) is the harder part. They can no longer claim partial compliance by using the .incubator. url. > > -0, since the Incubator remains unserious about incubation disclaimers on > websites. > > Marvin Humphrey > > [1] See for example the current http://eagle.incubator.apache.org/ where > you > have to scroll waaaaaay down before finding the incubator logo and the > small-type incubation disclaimers buried in the footer. > Yep, I have them on my to do. They're not out of compliance with the current wording, and we should probably update the current wording to say that it should be above the fold. > [2] The earlier audit: http://markmail.org/message/cqmmfuphhx2z6n23 > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
