Hi, +1 binding
But would be good clarify licenses of patches and fix up the slightly confusing section in LICENSE. I checked: - incubating in name - signature and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - NOTICE is good - LICENSE I think is missing a boost [1] and again I think the end section is confusing. Boost is MIT licensed and is in the source not just the binary [1] - all source files have Apache headers - no unexpected binary files - can compile from source There are a number of patches in [2], it’s not clear how they are licensed. Thanks, Justin 1. apache-kudu-incubating-0.9.1/thirdparty/boost_uuid/boost/* 2. thirdparty/patches/* --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
