I don't blame you, it's going to be a huge gain for the ASF in general.
Care to join me in a conversation on infra about this?
On Jun 17, 2016 19:25, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <
chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:

> I am not supportive of any further uses of git-dual while my
> two requests for Nutch and Tika remain in the queue. I’m sorry
> but not supportive of that.
>
> Chris
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> Chief Architect
> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398)
> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> WWW:  http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department
> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 6/17/16, 3:58 PM, "John D. Ament" <john.d.am...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Leif,
> >
> >I doubt this is something IPMC can help you with.  As champion, I would
> >recommend that you reach out to infra to see the appetite to support
> >git-dual on a podling.  You will want to explain the scenario with the
> >"partner" project
> >
> >Either way, from a project proposal standpoint the git.apache.org URL is
> >the canonical version, just that git-dual supports bi-directional syncing
> >of the repos.  I would recommend keeping that as the listed version, to
> >allow the podling to not be impeded in further discussions over listing
> the
> >github URL as the canonical resource.
> >
> >John
> >
> >On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 6:47 PM Leif Hedstrom <zw...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> > On Jun 16, 2016, at 3:29 PM, Mattmann, Chris A (3980) <
> >> chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > Sounds cool!
> >> >
> >> > Git-dual is not a broad option right now unfortunately so that will
> need
> >> to be updated to git-wp.
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >> It this a hard rule? Would infra or the incubator PMC be able to make an
> >> exception for this incubation? Besides the fact that Traffic Control ist
> >> already fully hosted on Github, it’s sibling project (Traffic Server) is
> >> already migrated over to MATT and Github. There are definite benefit for
> >> both projects if we keep them both on the same infrastructure.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> — Leif
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>

Reply via email to