On Mon, Jun 6, 2016 at 5:06 PM, William A Rowe Jr <wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 8:13 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 11:02 AM Marvin Humphrey < > mar...@rectangular.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:21 AM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >> > All, > > >> > > > >> > Did anyone change something recently in SVN? I pulled this morning > and > > >> got > > >> > back a larger than expected amount of content. It seems like the > > whole > > >> > site tree's been duplicated. > > >> > > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1746519 > > >> > > >> > > > :-( > > > > > > Any thoughts on how to fix this? Is it just a matter of deleting a > > > directory tree? > > > > Yeah, it's just `svn rm FULL_URL`. I took care of it. > > > > Please folks: always preview before you commit. With Subversion, > > that's `svn diff`. > > > > The way to revert without causing a huge update is to remove the target > tree, and > svn cp -r{rev-before-break} https://s.a.o/r/a/tlp/o/trunk > https://s.a.o/r/a/tlp/o/trunk > which basically backspaces between what was messed up to what should now be > present, which is usually a minimal delta to most people's checkouts > Those instructions are completely wrong :-( There were changes after the breakage, and the above would have reverted those. No, the *correct* thing is a reverse merge of the offending change. However, Marvin partially did that with an "rm" of one subtree, which would make a reverse merge harder (not impossible tho). I followed up his change with another, to completely remove all the offending new files. Cheers, -g
