On 3/7/16, 12:26 PM, "Craig Russell" <craig.russ...@oracle.com> wrote:
>As I understand it, LICENSE is for licenses. Period. If advertising is >required, the NOTICE file is used. Sorry, I should have been more clear. When I said "consider NOTICE" I meant that any NOTICE for the non-ASF AL dependency may have content that needs to into the NOTICE and not LICENSE. > >If there are third party works included in a distribution that use the >same Apache 2.0 license as any Apache components, the license file >already contains the appropriate license. Agreed. Sebb's recommendation, AIUI, was to simply mention in LICENSE that there is a non-ASF AL bundle without copying the entire LICENSE. -Alex
