Hi Liang, Thank you for your interest. Sure we would consider you adding in interested contributors list. >Mnemonic is trying to solve performance issues associated with serialization/deserialization of java object when dealing with JVM & disk directly as well as GC pressure caused by caching ?
Yes. >whether Mnemonic could solve Hadoop Namenode pressure of large scale of cluster scenaros, or not? Yeah, we are thinking on some aspects considering memory and GC overheads in Namenode too. Example couple of JIRAs already there in HDFS to move some of data structure to off heap. So, we had plans to get the standard data structures from this library and can make use of them push. Also we could make advantage if persistence here. @Yanping/Gary, may be you could add more points if you have? Regards, Uma On 2/23/16, 6:48 PM, "Liang Chen" <chenliang...@huawei.com> wrote: >Interesting, would love to become the contributor > >My understanding: Mnemonic is trying to solve performance issues >associated >with serialization/deserialization of java object when dealing with JVM & >disk directly as well as GC pressure caused by caching ? > >one question: whether Mnemonic could solve Hadoop Namenode pressure of >large >scale of cluster scenaros, or not? > > > >-- >View this message in context: >http://apache-incubator-general.996316.n3.nabble.com/DISCUSS-Mnemonic-incu >bator-proposal-tp48502p48533.html >Sent from the Apache Incubator - General mailing list archive at >Nabble.com. > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
