Hi,
> Normally we should only have dual licensed GPL/CDDL unless I have missed
> something.
Note that most of the GPL/CDDL dual licensed files have this:
If you wish your version of this file to be governed by only the CDDL or
only the GPL Version 2, indicate your decision by adding "[Contributor]
elects to include this software in this distribution under the [CDDL or GPL
Version 2] license." If you don't indicate a single choice of license, a
recipient has the option to distribute your version of this file under
either the CDDL, the GPL Version 2 or to extend the choice of license to
its licensees as provided above.
So putting the text of the GPL license in LICENSE may not be a good idea.
The one that concerns me (but there may be others) is this [1] which is found
in [2]. You may want to talk to Karaf about it. Karaf’s notice file does
contain a reference to it and says it’s Apache licensed [3] but it license file
has it under another permissive license [4] It may be that at some point the
license terms fro the software have changed but I don’t know what version is
included in that jar. It looks like the pom.xml doesn’t specify a version? [5]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://wrapper.tanukisoftware.com/doc/english/licenseOverview.html
2.
./unomi-1.0.0-incubating/system/org/apache/karaf/wrapper/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core/3.0.2/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core-3.0.2.jar
3. https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/NOTICE
4. https://github.com/apache/karaf/blob/master/LICENSE
5.
http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/karaf/wrapper/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core/3.0.2/org.apache.karaf.wrapper.core-3.0.2.pom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
