Thanks Marvin for the clarification. An annotation would *really* help while I keep pushing the SGA.
debo On 12/6/15, 7:46 PM, "Marvin Humphrey" <mar...@rectangular.com> wrote: >On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Debo Dutta (dedutta) <dedu...@cisco.com> >wrote: >> Hi Owen >> >> This is good. >> >> The SGA stuff is still in progress. Cisco is very interested in Metron >>and >> would like to be involved (in fact the opensrc folks at Cisco seem to be >> unaware of the Metron proposal - till we talked about the SGA). Would it >> be possible to put an addendum to the original Metron proposal that >>Cisco >> is interested - to set the facts straight! > >Cisco's involvement would of course be welcome and it's great to hear >about the positive internal reactions. > >The Metron proposal text was the subject of an IPMC VOTE. Any >"addendum" should take the form of annotations that do not appear to >change the meaning of the VOTE ex post facto. But that doesn't mean we >can't be accommodating -- we have plenty of flexibility. > >Marvin Humphrey > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org