+1. The Jekyll flow is great and has a low learning curve. On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:12 PM, larry mccay <lmc...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 - this would be a great resource for bootstrapping a new project! > > On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Julian Hyde <jh...@apache.org> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I had the same thought when I built Calcite’s site based on jekyll > > (actually cloned from Orc’s site). Thanks for making this template — I’m > > sure it will be helpful to new projects. > > > > We should make it clear that it is optional, of course. But when Calcite > > entered the incubator there were entirely too many choices (and > > opportunities to make mistakes). The whole svnpubsub vs cms question, for > > instance, delayed our web site by about 6 months because we weren’t sure > > whether we could backtrack once we had made a decision. So I think it > would > > be useful if there were some default choices to get incubator projects > off > > and running quickly. > > > > I also think it would be useful to provide a template for maven/java > based > > projects. There would be a pom.xml, module/pom.xml and > > module/org/apache/foo/Foo.java, and just enough content in the pom.xml to > > be able to make a release by typing “mvn release:prepare … mvn > > release:perform”. If anyone is interested I’ll do it. > > > > Luciano, Did you have a place in mind to put your template site? I think > > it would need to be in an apache project, not in github, so that any > > podling can import it without worrying about IP contamination. > > > > Julian > > > > > > > > > On Nov 7, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Easy is good > > > > > > > > > The Jekyll work flow has worked well in the project I have mentored. > > > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > >> On Nov 7, 2015, at 10:04, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > >> > > >> I have just spent a day or so building a new podling website based on > > >> Jekyll and I tried to model it as a template, where a new > > project/podling > > >> can easily modify _data/project.yml and configure it's name, dev list, > > user > > >> list, jira, source repository, etc. > > >> > > >> I was wondering if this would be good as a "template" where new > projects > > >> that come on board could easily fork to start their website and just > > change > > >> the styles and contents of main page, and voila, the site would be > > ready, > > >> with all the required trademarks and other apache requirements, etc > > >> > > >> Thoughts ? > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Luciano Resende > > >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 > > >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
