+1 Agree entirely. -C On Thu, Nov 5, 2015 at 4:30 AM, Justin Erenkrantz <jus...@erenkrantz.com> wrote: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2015 at 12:50 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> > wrote: >> Correct. It is a tool, but not a requirement (at least not yet). >> And since I repeatedly suggested this tool on this thread let me explain why. > > And, this is the root of my concern expressed in the other general@ > thread: I fear that this is going to quickly evolve to yet another > bureaucratic form that the IPMC is going to quickly require all > projects to complete. > > We should not be trying to force rote learning. Every community is different. > > Trust the mentors or don't - but, I am very much opposed to more > overhead. Forcing projects to feel like they have to report monthly > is against what we should be about. I believe that the IPMC should be > imposing the barest amount of overhead to what the Board requires from > the full projects. To that end, having mentors explicitly sign-off is > fair - but, additional paperwork is not. -- justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
