That's certainly a reasonable approach, but it doesn't quite capture what I'm
talking about when I mention the concept of having individual working groups to
do more focused collaboration on specific areas of work activity. Where these
conversations take place isn't really all that important, what is important is
that we have them.
On Thursday, October 15, 2015 3:38 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Joe Schaefer
<joe_schae...@yahoo.com.invalid> wrote:
> ...Formally, that's all a working group needs to be- yet another mailing
> list....
I'm not in favor of more mailing lists, I think [tags] in subject
lines can pretty much do the same thing without splitting the
community (as per Stefano Mazzocchi's busy lists pattern [1]).
So maybe just define a set of such tags like [graduation], [proposal]
[release] etc. but stay here.
-Bertrand
[1] http://grep.codeconsult.ch/2011/12/06/stefanos-mazzocchis-busy-list-pattern/
