Chris,
Thanks for articulating what I was going to respond with after talking to
folks here. We indeed see versions for Malhar and Apex differing. We expect
Malhar versions to change much more rapidly than Apex.

Ted,
We discussed the impact of single jira on versioning.  For example we
expect Malhar X.0.0 to happen much earlier than Apex X.0.0. There was
discomfort in naming versions with prefix. The consensus was to have
version numbers convey stuff. If folks don't have strong opinion on two
jiras, we would prefer to use two jiras. We have taken up Bertrand's scope
naming and changed the names of jira projects as follows

APX-CORE
APX-MLHR

I have changed the wiki to reflect the above as jira project names.

Thks,
Amol


On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Chris Nauroth <cnaur...@hortonworks.com>
wrote:

> One thing to consider is that release version numbers are tied to specific
> JIRA projects.  If the intention is for Apex and Malhar version numbers to
> be independent, then using a single JIRA project could introduce some risk
> of confusion if an Apex version number accidentally gets applied to a
> Malhar issue.  It might necessitate prefixing the version numbers with
> "apex-" and "malhar-" to differentiate.
>
> Based on that, I have a slight preference for separate JIRA projects.
> However, I don't object to using a single unified JIRA project if others
> feel strongly about it.
>
> --Chris Nauroth
>
>
>
>
> On 8/11/15, 8:23 AM, "Amol Kekre" <a...@datatorrent.com> wrote:
>
> >Ted,
> >I agree that repo is more critical than jira instance. I am taking up your
> >suggesstion with folks and should get back soon.
> >
> >Thks
> >Amol
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 3:48 AM, Ted Dunning <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> I personally see far less reason for separate JIRA instances than git
> >> repos. Having all jiras under APEX seems a good choice.
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >> > On Aug 11, 2015, at 2:32, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org
> >
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > As for JIRA, I would apply the same rule, so APX-CORE and APX-MHAR
> >>maybe.
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
>
>

Reply via email to