Bertrans, yes, something like that. I think a simple page in the regular documentation is good enough, which states the model items, whether fully complies with it, and if not why that is the case. Start out to make it a recommendation to all podlings to take a look and incorporate, thumbs up for those who do it, and over time increase the pressure a little bit.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 3:28 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org> wrote: > > ...the maturity model shouldn't be a set of gating criteria, but that the > > podling should self-assess its position and to what degree, as well as > how, > > each point is handled. Yes, many of the points are non-negotiable, but > > don't claim that all are... > > So you would see the maturity model as one element of the Incubation > graduating checklist, with self-assessment from the podling and its > mentors? I like the idea. > > -Bertrand > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
