Hi, > I think we just missed it, based on the example, I don't think we can > use that escape-clause/rationale for its inclusion. We should take it > back to the dev list at this point.
Hope it easily replaceable with something that’s more Apache license compatable. > Yeah, these were just to drive some tests but I reckon we should craft > another way that ships in source form. If it’s easy to do that would be preferable. > They're sources needed to produce a [valid] binary package so it > seemed reasonable to me include them. Perhaps a README or NOTE in the directory saying that? Thanks, Justin
