I will personally abolish copyright. Join the future. unlicense.org Am 27.06.2015 19:09 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>:
> Stefan, > > It is hard to understand what you meant since we don't have a common frame > of reference. > > It sounds like you want to share with others. That is great. > > But it also sounds like you want to disregard how the world works with > respect to copyrights. That won't work. As I have just proved in this > same discussion, it is very common that no matter what you know, there is > more that you don't know. Copyrights are complicated and won't go away. > > In your case, it sounds like you need to find ways to share that are as > easy as possible. That is what Apache licenses are for. > > > > On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Stefan Reich < > stefan.reich.maker.of....@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > What do you think I meant? > > Am 26.06.2015 08:51 schrieb "Ted Dunning" <ted.dunn...@gmail.com>: > > > > > Stefan, > > > > > > In order to "open source" something, you have to define what you mean > by > > > "open source". If you mean that anybody can do anything at all with > the > > > code including claim it as their own, then you mean to put it into the > > > public > > > domain <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain>. > > > > > > If you mean anything else at all, then you have to specify what you > mean. > > > Even if all you want to say is that people have to admit that you wrote > > the > > > code, you have to specify that. > > > > > > The way that you specify what you want is to pick or write a license. > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 25, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Stefan Reich < > > > stefan.reich.maker.of....@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Please - can we all stop using "licenses" and just open source > > > everything? > > > > Progress is waiting for us. > > > > > > > > BTW, I am now adding all (!) programming languages to the realm of > AI. > > > > (Meaning they can then be programmed automatically.) > tinybrain.blog.de > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > Stefan > > > > Am 21.06.2015 00:51 schrieb "Lewis John Mcgibbney" < > > > > lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > > > Hi Folks, > > > > > I am looking for some advice here. > > > > > We are currently in conversation about potentially transitioning > the > > > > Joshua > > > > > project [0] to the foundation. Our current conversation is ongoing > at > > > > [1]. > > > > > From one of the key developers of Joshua, the following question > has > > > > arose; > > > > > There is an issue with an LGPL'd library for handling language > models > > > > > (KenLM > > > > > <https://github.com/kpu/kenlm>). There is an alternative > > (BerkeleyLM), > > > > but > > > > > it is not actively maintained any more and is not quite as good as > > > KenLM > > > > in > > > > > a few key respects. A quick glance at the incubator page suggests > > that > > > > this > > > > > dependency would keep the project from becoming a full-fledged one. > > Can > > > > you > > > > > comment on this? > > > > > Thanks for any input folks > > > > > Lewis > > > > > > > > > > [0] http://joshua-decoder.org/ > > > > > [1] https://github.com/joshua-decoder/joshua/issues/204 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > *Lewis* > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
