On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:35 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 8:30 PM jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On Saturday, March 28, 2015, Marvin Humphrey <mar...@rectangular.com> >> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Mar 27, 2015 at 5:18 PM, Konstantin Boudnik <c...@apache.org >> > <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > Just to make sure - first month after acceptance in the Incubator a >> > podling >> > > isn't expected to send their report, right? The point in question is >> > Groovy: >> > > they are working on the report, but I don't think they really have to. >> > > >> > > Please correct me if I am wrong on that. >> > >> > We shouldn't insist that a days-old podling produce a report, but if >> > they take the initiative and want to file, they're welcome to. >> >> +1 but if they do, let it count as the first of the 3 month reportinh. >> > > Of course it should. However, I think their reporting group is wrong as > the months don't add up currently. I think we spoke (on the general list) > previously about the reporting groups being based on when accepted to the > incubator (in the case of Groovy, March). So currently they'll be required > to report 4 months in a row. > > I'd recommend that Groovy be moved to reporting group 3, reporting April, > May and June then again in September (if still in incubation at that point). > > http://incubator.staging.apache.org/report-groups.txt
Not a big deal one way or the other. Reporting isn't onerous. I have a mild preference for leaving it because they've already seen it, but whatever keeps this thread short is fine with me. Marvin Humphrey --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
