On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz <bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote: >> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque.... > > So you mean all TLPs should have status labels? > > Might be useful...probatory, active, low activity, attic candidate...why not.
Absolutely. And it belongs to a different effort (just trying as hard as I can not to boil the ocean with pTLP for now). Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org