On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 6:58 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz
<bdelacre...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 3:38 PM, Alan D. Cabrera <l...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> In short, the pTLP designation is a bit too opaque....
>
> So you mean all TLPs should have status labels?
>
> Might be useful...probatory, active, low activity, attic candidate...why not.

Absolutely. And it belongs to a different effort (just trying as hard as I can
not to boil the ocean with pTLP for now).

Thanks,
Roman.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to