On Jan 23, 2015 8:53 AM, "jan i" <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 23 January 2015 at 14:42, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > >... > > I agree with everything else you write, but the demand for "only ASF > Members" seems very hard. If I come to ASF with a community and a project, > I really would feel unhappy being cut out of the loop (PMC cares about the > community, not the committers following our role definition). > > Would it not be possible to write "The initial PMC must be comprised of > more than 50% ASF Members", or something similar.
It would be a Resolution put before the Board. So the initial mix can be whatever you can get away with. :-) As a Director, I'd look for 100%. But with some rationale, one or two others could be fine. > If this came to vote, I would give it a -1, because we cannot and should > not "overrule" an existing community, but merely guide them. The community is who agreed on the approach and placed it before the Board, for pTLP status. And only the Board would be voting on that Resolution. Cheers, -g
