At least for this go around, I did the work manually (basically, scan the report, see who had some problem that a shepherd could have helped with and did the shepherd provide a comment). Comparing podlings that weren't quite perfect to shepherds that made notes of it. I would say the following shepherds did not provide due diligence during this month's report:
- Andrei Savu * - Dave Fisher - Matthew Franklin - Raphael Bircher The following shepherds either did not provide, or did provide but saw no issues to comment on within their podlings: - Alan Cabrera - Ross Gardler - Suresh Marru Basically, this means that more than 50% of the shepherds are seemingly idle on the report perspective. John * = I was split on Andrei's placing, as Drill should have fallen off but they have not properly graduated from podlings.xml stand point. On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 4:33:06 PM Roman Shaposhnik <ro...@shaposhnik.org> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:25 PM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > Seen from the POW of one who is new around here, it seems a bit like > having > > a title for the sake of a title. > > I mean, we have to call that function *something* > > > I understand and value the functions of both "champion" and "mentor" and > of > > course also the "iPMC". But I fail to see the big difference between > being > > an official shepherd, and just helping a project. > > The only difference here is that we have to track shepherd so that > our script knows the pool of folks to assign. > > Also, being on that list is a really good karma booster for non-ASF members > interested in helping around Incubator in a more formal capacity. > > Thanks, > Roman. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > >
