Even if you were following the 2013 Alternate Release Voting Process [1], it requires that you send a summary to the general list once complete.
The fact that http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/batchee doesn't work, where neither your 0.1 nor 0.2 release is present makes me thing it wasn't a complete release. John [1]: http://incubator.apache.org/incubation/Incubation_Policy.html On Mon Nov 10 2014 at 4:14:36 AM jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > On 10 November 2014 08:26, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > Regarding your question re our last release. I did send a notice to the > > general list [1]. > > > > I saw and read that message to general as that voting was underway not > > that you had a result. > > > > > The rules for the incubator release process got changed quite a few > > times in the last 5 years. So it might well be that this procedure of > just > > noticing the incubator and not needing a 2nd explicit VOTE on the general > > list (after the internal vote) is not correct anymore? > > > Oh and afaik we got our 3 +1 IPMCs already in our internal vote. > > > > In most cases you need a second vote on the general incubator list. > > However if you got three incubator PMC +1 votes in the dev list vote then > > nothing more is required, although you might want to note that in the > vote > > results. > > > Noting the vote result is strongly recommended, since it gives the rest of > us a chance to follow when what is released. > > rgds > jan i. > > > > > > Thanks, > > Justin > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org > > > > >
