On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Sean Owen <sro...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes it means greater downstream burden, yes it may have originated > from a 'hack', but that doesn't seem to make the license not say what > it says. Obviously I'd rather not have to do this either. >
It is a tortured and patently incorrect reading to assume that the license requires TWO copies of such notices.
