I think David asked it today because Brett, David and I shared a coffee yesterday and this was one of the topics of conversation. It's timing that's all.
The problem with working out *during* incubation is that the foundation has already committed to providing the support necessary. We need an indication upon entry. I believe David asked this question in order to start doing this informally while we figure out how to do it in a more consistent and managed way. In summary, I fully agree with your comment "We should ask the same questions to projects" and moving forwards I believe we will do so - starting now. Sent from Surface From: Chris Mattmann<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: ?Thursday?, ?September? ?25?, ?2014 ?11?:?03? ?AM To: <[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Shoaib Sufi<mailto:[email protected]> We should ask the same questions to projects and I don't see this question of infrastructure asked very often. So I raised it. David of course is doing great and I just saw some of this as can be worked out during incubation Thanks Sent from my iPhone > On Sep 25, 2014, at 10:46 AM, "Ross Gardler (MS OPEN TECH)" > <[email protected]> wrote: > > It's a requirement for the ASF to support its projects. Understanding what > impact each project coming into the incubator might have is important to > allow VP Infra to plan for our growth. David did not ask if Manchester will > be donating resources, he asked what do they currently provide and what does > the project think they will need from the ASF. > > For the record, I am familiar with Taverna from a previous life. It's is > interesting to see this proposal coming to the ASF. The first time this was > discussed with the University of Manchester was many years ago. The > conversation occurred every couple of years, each time with different people, > but never progressed to a proposal. Given the answers in this thread things > have changed quite considerably since then. > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Mattmann, Chris A (3980)<mailto:[email protected]> > Sent: ?9/?25/?2014 10:09 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Cc: Shoaib Sufi<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow > > Hi Guys, > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: David Nalley <[email protected]> > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Date: Thursday, September 25, 2014 9:34 AM > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Cc: Shoaib Sufi <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Taverna workflow > > [..snip..] >> >> I see two paragraphs here that don't answer the question posed. Where >> will plugin development happen in an ideal world? > > This is an implementation detail and can be dealt with during Incubation? > >> >> One followup question - what kind of build/CI resources does the >> University of Manchester provide? What manner of resources do you >> believe you'll need if the project moves to the ASF? > > Is it a requirement for projects to provide build/CI resources > now to enter the Incubator? I do not believe that it is. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
