BTW, my prior offer on doing this stands. We just need interest in both ends.
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Diversity and 'nonpartisan' governance will be critical for graduating a > security project, in my opinion, so it will be important to monitor the > attention and openness in community development during incubation. > > Although the folks behind Argus do not wish to join Apache Sentry > (incubating) or take up any of its artifacts, I encourage both communities > to find common ground and take some sort of productive common steps. In my > opinion, evidence of that would go a long way toward addressing concerns > like the above when and if it is time to consider graduation - of either > project. > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 9:03 AM, Owen O'Malley <omal...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Following the discussion earlier, I'm calling a vote to accept Argus as a > > new Incubator project. > > > > The proposal draft is available at: > > https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/ArgusProposal, and is also included > > below. > > > > Vote is open for 72h and closes at 24 July 2014 at 10am PST. > > > > [ ] +1 accept Argus in the Incubator > > [ ] +/-0 > > [ ] -1 because... > > > > I'm +1. > > > > .. Owen > > > > > > -- > Best regards, > > - Andy > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > (via Tom White) > -- Alejandro
