On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 1:18 AM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think its something like "If a podling is over a year old and not > done a release then retire it".
Almost. What is being proposed is not an immediate retirement, but rather a vote. So it should really read: "If a podling is over a year old and not done a release then start a discussion of retiring the podling" > As i've said i don't think thats a > very good rule and doesn't seem like its really been thought through > properly. For example, its kept saying that the podling would go to > the ASF Attic but the Attic is only for TLPs so retired podlings don't > go there. That's actually the part of the thread that I have a lot of interest in. Is there any reason not to use attic for hibernated podlings? > How about before adding a new rule to the policy page we just try it > with a few of the old podlings first to see what happens and from that > find what sort of rule might work? That would be fine too. Thanks, Roman. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: general-h...@incubator.apache.org
